This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>,GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:22:07 +0100
Subject: Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
References: <3FB68E4E.6060308@develer.com> <200311152348.15631.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <3FB6DBAB.1080006@develer.com>

> You mean the patch does not break libjava on 3.3.3?

Sorry, I mis-read the PR number, my CVS checkout for the 3.3 branch has

2003-11-14  Bernardo Innocenti  <bernie@develer.com>

	Backport from 3.4-branch.

	2003-06-25  Giovanni Bajo  <giovannibajo@libero.it>

        PR c++/2094
        * pt.c (unify): Add support for PTRMEM_CST and
        FIELD_DECL unification.

as the last ChangeLog entry, so I didn't test the patch for PR2294.

> Ok then, I've not yet reverted it, so it can stay.

A quick test to determine whether libjava is broken is to run the C++ 
testsuite. If you see hundreds of failures, then libjava is very likely 
broken.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti

References:
- [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [c++,committed] Revert patch for PR/c++2294
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]