This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Removal of gotos from cfg based ir


On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 law@redhat.com wrote:

> In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311140104370.31354-100000@nondot.org>, Chris Lattner
>  writes:
>  >> > how do you get the edges in the cfg then?
>  >> Def-use edges, which are tracked for all SSA values.
>  >Sorry for the terseness.  Def-use edges are used to get predecessors,
>  >use-def edges are used to get successors.

> Sorry if I'm being overly dense -- I don't see how def-use or use-def
> gets you control edges.  Unless you do something like build the SSA
> graph for jump targets/jump statements.  Is that what LLVM does
> (if so, I'll have to sit down and think about that for a while, it's
> an interesting idea... )

Oh right, sorry.  In LLVM, each function contains a doubly linked list of
basic blocks.  Each basic block contains a doubly linked list of
instructions (thus the CFG contains the instructions themselves).  To get
the predecessors of a block, you simply look at all of the users of that
block (which are the control flow instructions at the end of predecessor
blocks).  To the successors of a block, we just look at which basic blocks
the terminator at the end of the block branches to.

So, in other words, each basic block has a use list, and all terminator
instructions (e.g. branches) _use_ the basic block destinations.  With
this organization, the SSA graph provides the CFG, and it can never get
out of date.

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]