This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] BIND_EXPR removal
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:06:10PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, I was just about to say the opposite--that we should be moving all the
> variables to the outer BIND_EXPR rather than to some random global
> variable. Of course, to do that we'd need to support a TREE_LIST for
> BIND_EXPR_VARS, but that shouldn't be difficult.
*shrug* The whole function soon will be a set of basic blocks that are
not connected. I don't see any reason to keep the outer bind_expr.
> Perhaps we could express this by inserting a new statement to express that
> X is dead?
A definite possibility.