Re: [tree-ssa] BIND_EXPR removal

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:06:10PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, I was just about to say the opposite--that we should be moving all the
> variables to the outer BIND_EXPR rather than to some random global
> variable.  Of course, to do that we'd need to support a TREE_LIST for
> BIND_EXPR_VARS, but that shouldn't be difficult.

*shrug*  The whole function soon will be a set of basic blocks that are
not connected.  I don't see any reason to keep the outer bind_expr.

> Perhaps we could express this by inserting a new statement to express that
> X is dead?

A definite possibility.


r~