This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes: > Sorry, I think your approach is wrong. You're adding strict warnings > (-pedantic) to target files which are only compiled by gcc and thus > should be able to use gcc-isms. Then you're working on needlessly > fixing these warnings and/or also proposing adding -Wno-error to new > files which used to compile cleanly. > > I think you should consider another approach. I'm going to guess that > the new warnings from SYSCALLS.c are all of the "old-style" > declaration type? If so, you may want to simply add > -Wno-old-style-declarations to the rule which compiles that file. > Should be a one line fix. It is - I send it previously. But I was surprised that the -warn=-Wno-error black-listing does not work... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |