This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [new-ra] bring bootstrap further

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: matz at suse dot de
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 03 18:07:01 EST
Subject: Re: [new-ra] bring bootstrap further

 	      & (DF_REF_READ_WRITE | DF_REF_MODE_CHANGE
    -		 | DF_REF_COMPARE_RELATED)) == ref_flags)
    +		 | DF_REF_COMPARE_RELATED | DF_REF_STRIPPED)) == ref_flags)

The whitespace conventions don't allow "mixed-level" like that,
where the "==" is after the close paren.  A long time ago, RMS showed me
that we write this as

           && (ref_flags == (DF_REF_FLAGS (this_ref)
	 	             & (DF_REF_READ_WRITE | DF_REF_MODE_CHANGE
		 	        | DF_REF_COMPARE_RELATED | DF_REF_STRIPPED))

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]