This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 17:31, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > there is SWITCH_EXPR removal. Then BIND_EXPR removal -- the first patch
> > > for it (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg01962.html +
> > > perhaps one updated version, IIRC) is also laying idle for about month and half now,
> > > plus about two additional patches are requiered for this. Then
> >
> > I will take a look at SWITCH removal now, if you have that laying around
> > somewhere. (well, 'now' probably means monday now that its friday night
> > :-) Don't worry about removing the insert code required for switches, I
> > can delete those once they arent needed any more. (A form of therapy
> > perhaps :-)
> >
> > IIRC BIND_EXPR had some complexities Im not familiar with (debugging
> > symbols perhaps?), I think it was rth you worked this through with
> > wasn't it? perhaps in the interest of expediance he can take a look at
> > that one, although I will as well if he doesnt get to it. There are 3
> > patches if I read your note correctly?
> >
> > Is BIND_EXPR dependant in any way on SWITCH? ie, do we need to get
> > SWITCH and COND in before a BIND_EXPR patch has any hope of applying?
>
> no, bind_exprs are completely independent issue. I will try to create
> the SWITCH_EXPR lowering patch tomorrow (although the fact that
> COND_EXPR lowering is not in is complicating this; the two patches
> will neccesarily conflict with each other).
Hold off for a day or two then, we'll get COND_EXPR in shortly, then you
can produce the SWITCH patch..
Andrew