This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering.


Hello,

> writes:
>  >Perhaps we ought to change the semantics of COND_EXPR completely and not
>  >consider its clauses separate statements.  If we are going to do this,
>  >we need to make sure that the iterators never stop at the clauses, only
>  >at the parent COND_EXPR.
> At which point I think you have to use something other than COND_EXPR
> since I believe it's assumed all over the place that statements are
> hung off the arms of a COND_EXPR.  That's one of the reasons why I really
> want to see the arms continue to be normal looking GOTO_EXPR statements.

no, there is not a single place where it is assumed.

Zdenek


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]