This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++.dg/other/static11.C regression
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:39:01 -0700
- Subject: Re: g++.dg/other/static11.C regression
- References: <20031019185853.GA24902@twiddle.net> <87vfqlqaa4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20031019195207.GA14927@twiddle.net> <87n0bxq883.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87ekx8rk1i.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 02:31:53PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > What do you think of having print_reg alter its behavior depending on
> > whether file == asm_out_file? That lets us restore the abort for the
> > case where it matters; we could also restore the printout of the
> > internal register number.
>
> I'm bootstrapping this patch, which is based on that concept, now. It
> leaves the text printed alone; as I said, I kinda like not showing the
> internal register number for hard regs.
Thanks.
r~