This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[m68k] remove obsolete comments from m68k.c
- From: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: bernie at develer dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:19:24 +0200
- Subject: [m68k] remove obsolete comments from m68k.c
Hello!
In a previous patch some comments about asm_fprintf() not handling '%' got
removed. The attached patch removes some more occurences.
Gunther
-- cut --
2003-10-17 Gunther Nikl <gni@gecko.de>
* config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_output_function_prologue): remove
obsolete comments
--- m68k.c.orig Fri Oct 17 14:11:42 2003
+++ m68k.c Fri Oct 17 14:17:20 2003
@@ -548,7 +548,6 @@ m68k_output_function_prologue (FILE *str
{
if (!TARGET_COLDFIRE)
{
- /* asm_fprintf() cannot handle %. */
#ifdef MOTOROLA
asm_fprintf (stream, "\tsubq.w %I%wd,%Rsp\n", fsize_with_regs);
#else
@@ -557,7 +556,6 @@ m68k_output_function_prologue (FILE *str
}
else
{
- /* asm_fprintf() cannot handle %. */
#ifdef MOTOROLA
asm_fprintf (stream, "\tsubq.l %I%wd,%Rsp\n", fsize_with_regs);
#else
@@ -569,7 +567,6 @@ m68k_output_function_prologue (FILE *str
{
/* On the CPU32 it is faster to use two subqw instructions to
subtract a small integer (8 < N <= 16) to a register. */
- /* asm_fprintf() cannot handle %. */
#ifdef MOTOROLA
asm_fprintf (stream,
"\tsubq.w %I8,%Rsp\n\tsubq.w %I%wd,%Rsp\n",
@@ -582,7 +579,6 @@ m68k_output_function_prologue (FILE *str
else if (TARGET_68040)
{
/* Adding negative number is faster on the 68040. */
- /* asm_fprintf() cannot handle %. */
#ifdef MOTOROLA
asm_fprintf (stream, "\tadd.w %I%wd,%Rsp\n", -fsize_with_regs);
#else
-- cut --