This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH - updated] New Optimization: Partitioning hot & coldbasic blocks

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Caroline Tice <ctice at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:08:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH - updated] New Optimization: Partitioning hot & coldbasic blocks
References: <7CBD1A2E-F9C4-11D7-A34B-000393BB90B6@apple.com> <41F38A00-FAAC-11D7-BDC3-000A95A23B58@apple.com>

> I have modified the original patch I submitted to make sure that no 
> line is longer than 77
> characters, and I also added documentation for the new macro and the 
> new command line
> flag, as people have requested me to do.  Below are the modified 
> ChangeLog entry, and the
> modified patch.  Please review this and let me know if I may commit it.

Actually, I can't find the original message from this from a search. I'm
likely blind. What kind of performance improvements are you seeing? What
kind of increase/decrease in bootstrap time? What does it take for other
platforms to take advantage of this (if anything)?

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- [PATCH] New Optimization: Partitioning hot & cold basic blocks
  - From: Caroline Tice
- [PATCH - updated] New Optimization: Partitioning hot & cold basic blocks
  - From: Caroline Tice

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]