This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:01:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20030918193545.GA14011@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1065632546.2629.182.camel@p4> <1065707246.6205.9.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031009135353.GA13920@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 09:53, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

> I don't quite understand your point here.  When one of branches is
> removed, the COND_EXPR is just replaced by a GOTO expr. There is nothing
> more on this, since the branches are not considered separate statements
> and they are not reachable by any other means than by pattern matching
> on the COND_EXPR statement.
> 
Right you are.  Never mind.  I'm still groggy.


Diego.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]