This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods

From: Alexander Malmberg <alexander at malmberg dot org>
To: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
Cc: discuss-gnustep at gnu dot org, David Ayers <d dot ayers at inode dot at>, mah at jump-ing dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Pete French <pete at twisted dot org dot uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:37:57 +0200
Subject: Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
References: <E1A6nt6-000Fv7-3Y@toybox.twisted.org.uk> <3F829083.6020000@inode.at> <367AD92C-F8E5-11D7-BA6D-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <3F82F796.8FD852C2@malmberg.org> <E157A740-F8F3-11D7-8912-000393A91CAA@apple.com>

Devang Patel wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2003, at 10:27 AM, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
[snip]
> But if you want this badly and Objective-C maintainers approve
> it then go ahead! Its better if wording is different for the
> cases where compiler can actually determine that foo responds
> to bar, but forced to emit warning because user wants it.

I have no objections to changing the wording, as long as a warning is
issued. Better wording _would_ be a good thing.

- Alexander Malmberg

References:
- Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
  - From: Pete French
- Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
  - From: David Ayers
- Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
  - From: Alexander Malmberg
- Re: PATCH: Find more ObjC methods
  - From: Devang Patel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]