This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Avoid explicit use of machine modes (7/n) [NOT APPLIED YET]


On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:27:02PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Zack Weinberg writes: 
> 
> > dbxout.c uses machine mode numbers to decide which R-numbers to attach
> > to complex types.  gdb does not use this information in detail; it
> > looks to see whether the R-number indicates some kind of complex type,
> > and then it gets the rest of what it needs from the size.  Comments in
> > dbxout.c and include/aout/stabs_gnu.h suggest that gdb is the only
> > debugger we care about for complex types.  Furthermore, stabs is
> > obsolescent.  Therefore I propose to rip out all of the code for this
> > and just generate R3 (NF_COMPLEX) always.  Thoughts?
> 
> 	Stabs may be obsolescent, but it still is used by some targets,
> such as AIX and Darwin.

Well, Zack's right, GDB won't care.  Other debuggers might but I doubt
this is a big deal.  If it's just as easy, you could do it by mode
sizes, though.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]