This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch to gcc/Makefile.in for fastcompare* targets [take 2]

From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:11:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Patch to gcc/Makefile.in for fastcompare* targets [take 2]
References: <200309112057.h8BKv168017598@caip.rutgers.edu> <200309200516.h8K5GAmF008327@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030921220319.GA23436@disaster.jaj.com> <200309220219.h8M2Jkrj015479@caip.rutgers.edu>

On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:19:46PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> 
> I came to the conclusion that it wasn't worth it to duplicate the
> for-stmt and that the 0.1 second slowdown is okay given the removal of
> code duplication between slowcompare, gnucompare and the new
> fastcompare targets.

I agree completely.

-- 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    - Brian W. Kernighan

References:
- Patch to add fastcompare* targets
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Patch to gcc/Makefile.in for fastcompare* targets [take 2]
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: Patch to gcc/Makefile.in for fastcompare* targets [take 2]
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Patch to gcc/Makefile.in for fastcompare* targets [take 2]
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]