This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH]: Fix 11595

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Sep 2003 17:27:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH]: Fix 11595
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <1062858462.3602.54.camel@steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl><wvl4qzqt05k.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

| The use of POP_TIMEVAR_AND_RETURN seems unnecessary here.  In fact, it's
| not clear to me why it would ever be useful to combine the two operations.
| Gaby?

It is an automated way to ensure that functions with multiple
return-statements consistently pop the timevar stack in the return
statements. 
Arguably, it is not useful in this specific patch.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ PATCH]: Fix 11595
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [C++ PATCH]: Fix 11595
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [C++ PATCH]: Fix 11595
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]