Re: *ping* [PATCH] unit-at-a-time for java

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> Jeff Sturm writes:
>  > On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
>  > > Jeff Sturm writes:
>  > >  > Richard has already approved the cgraphunit hunks.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02158.html
>  > >
>  > > This is OK if you have no libgcj testsuite regressions at -O3.
>  > 
>  > I've taken another look at this.  The present state of libgcj on mainline
>  > is that it doesn't build with GCJFLAGS="-O3 -g" and has one testsuite
>  > failure at -O3.
>  > 
>  > The following patch (together with
>  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00082.html) corrects both and
>  > enables unit-at-a-time for gcj.  It avoids the problem I reported earlier
>  > (ICE in dwarf2out.c) by defining a start_inlining hook that cancels
>  > inlining if the function is not yet expanded.
> 
> Eeeeh.  So we only inline in order?  Nasty.  Still, I guess it's the
> best we can do at the present time.

Hmm just curious, what happens to the functions that gets inlined
completely so they are never expanded then?

Honza
> 
>  > Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline?
> 
> OK.  Thanks.
> 
> Andrew.