This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:33:40 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 12:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:25:58 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:15, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>> >
>> >> size of x now depends on non-existent variable z.1, which causes a crash
>> >> when an attempt to copy it before passing to foo is made.
>> >> 
>> > But this also means that we are still generating VLAs.  Shouldn't your
>> > original change removed that?
>> 
>> No, the decl still has VLA type.
>> 
> So, we can't really expose all VLAs then?  I was hoping we could
> eventually get rid of the 'has_hidden_uses' attribute.  Oh, well.

Perhaps we want to make the copy explicit in the trees.

Jason
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]