Re: [tree-ssa] Lowering of VLA's, part 2

[Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>]

On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 12:28, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:25:58 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:15, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> >
> >> size of x now depends on non-existent variable z.1, which causes a crash
> >> when an attempt to copy it before passing to foo is made.
> >> 
> > But this also means that we are still generating VLAs.  Shouldn't your
> > original change removed that?
> 
> No, the decl still has VLA type.
> 
So, we can't really expose all VLAs then?  I was hoping we could
eventually get rid of the 'has_hidden_uses' attribute.  Oh, well.


Diego.