This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Death to configure.frag
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com (Nathanael Nerode), gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2003 20:00:48 -0300
- Subject: Re: Death to configure.frag
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20030829204252.GA755@twcny.rr.com><87n0dsmaqx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
On Aug 29, 2003, "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hm, so is there anything stopping us from cutting over to
> AC_PREREQ(2.57) now?
I don't know of any, and I wouldn't mind such a switch for the GCC
sub-directory by itself, if we're doing it for the libraries soon.
But I wouldn't mind the patch going in as-is (except for the include
/dev/null -> ifneq thing).
> I think this will wind up being less weird and confusing, especially
> if we can get bootstrap moved to the top level and gcc/configure
> re-run between stages, so that all the 'override this stuff in stage
> 2 and beyond' mess will go away.
Wheee :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer