Re: [libstdc++] Add --disable-hosted-libstdcxx, clean up conditionals

[Bill Wendling <wendling at ncsa dot uiuc dot edu>]

Also sprach Gabriel Dos Reis:
} "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
} 
} | Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
} | 
} | Technical limitations of Bourne shell unfortunately have to trump
} | aesthetics.
} 
} Sure.  But, my motivation was not aesthetics.
} 
The "+" is not acceptable in a flag. It's a limitation, as mentioned
above. So the common way to deal with this is to replace + with x. It's
really that simple. This is a valid, well-thoughtout reason why you can't
have + in there.

What, then, are you suggesting we do to get around this problem?

-- 
|| Bill Wendling            "Real Programmers have a Snoopy Calendar
|| wendling@ncsa.uiuc.edu    of '69 hanging on their wall"
|| Coding Simian                       -- Toon Moene