This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Time to remove LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE?

From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jason Eckhardt <jle at owlnet dot rice dot edu>
Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 00:22:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Time to remove LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE?
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0308230110240.15015-100000@forest.owlnet.rice.edu>

Jason Eckhardt <jle@owlnet.rice.edu> writes:

> While cleaning up the i860 port, I noticed that the
> LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE macro seems to have outlived its
> usefulness.  It occurs only in the following files:
>
>  ./gcc/ChangeLog
>  ./gcc/ChangeLog.5
>  ./gcc/calls.c
>  ./gcc/config/stormy16/stormy16.h
>  ./gcc/doc/tm.texi
>
> The only back-end that even mentions it is stormy16-- and
> that is only in a comment.
>
> Is there any reason this macro should still exist?  If not,
> I propose the following patch to get rid of it.
>
> 2003-08-23  Jason Eckhardt  <jle@rice.edu>
>
> 	* calls.c (emit_library_call_value_1): Remove code related
> 	to LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE.
> 	* config/stormy16/stormy16.h: Remove mention of LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE.
> 	* doc/tm.texi: Likewise.
> 	* system.h: Poison the LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE macro.

Ok.

zw

References:
- Time to remove LIBGCC_NEEDS_DOUBLE?
  - From: Jason Eckhardt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]