This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used

> Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> | > > We don't, but I think we also don't care.  If a template argument is
> | > > relevant to the generated code, it will appear in an expression.  If a VLA
> | > > type is used in a decl, we catch it that way because we also walk the size
> | > > of a decl from the DECL_STMT.
> | > 
> | > OK.  If you're comfortable with that, it's OK by me.
> | Actually situation is even more complicated.  We have to deal with Java
> | tinfos and eh_spec_block.  Is the updated patch OK?
> | 
> | Thu Aug 14 12:19:25 CEST 2003  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
> 
> Nit:  Use the canonical form for date, e.g. 2003-08-14.

I will try to get used to that.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Honza
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]