This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:10:36 -0400
- Subject: Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used
- References: <B1FA0562-CE62-11D7-B919-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:22:11 -0400, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 10:18 US/Eastern, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
>> Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>>
>> | > > We don't, but I think we also don't care. If a template argument is
>> | > > relevant to the generated code, it will appear in an expression.
>> If a VLA
>> | > > type is used in a decl, we catch it that way because we also walk
>> the size
>> | > > of a decl from the DECL_STMT.
>> | >
>> | > OK. If you're comfortable with that, it's OK by me.
>> | Actually situation is even more complicated. We have to deal with Java
>> | tinfos and eh_spec_block. Is the updated patch OK?
>> |
>> | Thu Aug 14 12:19:25 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
>>
>> Nit: Use the canonical form for date, e.g. 2003-08-14.
>
> Stupid Nit: emacs is what is causing this.
My emacs (21.2) uses the ISO date format. Perhaps you need a
(setq add-log-time-format 'add-log-iso8601-time-string)
Jason