This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:22:11 -0400
- Subject: Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used
On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 10:18 US/Eastern, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
| > > We don't, but I think we also don't care. If a template
argument is
| > > relevant to the generated code, it will appear in an expression.
If a VLA
| > > type is used in a decl, we catch it that way because we also
walk the size
| > > of a decl from the DECL_STMT.
| >
| > OK. If you're comfortable with that, it's OK by me.
| Actually situation is even more complicated. We have to deal with
Java
| tinfos and eh_spec_block. Is the updated patch OK?
|
| Thu Aug 14 12:19:25 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Nit: Use the canonical form for date, e.g. 2003-08-14.
Stupid Nit: emacs is what is causing this.
Andrew