This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] one more missed mark_used

> 
> > Just for this part?  So, that means the patch is not approved since
> > you had also comments on another part.
> 
> Correct.  I believe that my comment that:
> 
> > You should be careful about this test.  For example, I expect that you
> > will now not walk the initializers of declarations, which might
> contain
> > pointers-to-members, or statement-expressions containing try/catch
> > blocks.
> 
> is still valid.
I see.
Would be the patch OK with that test dropped?
Perhaps we can still skip the types right?

Honza
> 
> -- 
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery, LLC
> mark@codesourcery.com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]