This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,wwwdocs] Remove duplicate mailing list instructions (was Re: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?))
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:15:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH,wwwdocs] Remove duplicate mailing list instructions (was Re: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?))
- References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F3737C@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0308051311001.23184@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20030806164603.GA17335@disaster.jaj.com> <Pine.BSF.4.56.0308061848580.80312@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:49:16PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >> [Note that these patch policies are documented in both lists.html and
> >> contribute.html. We might want to do something about this duplication.]
> > Like so?
>
> Looks cool, thanks.
Done.
--
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
- Brian W. Kernighan