This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
[Taking distcc list off, per request received in private]
On Aug 4, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> Still, I think -Pwd fits in better. I could rearrange it such that
> it didn't require specs change, but think would be trickier if we
> supported a negative form. Or rather a positive form, since the
> code I have now is to omit the working directory, not to emit it,
> and we couldn't emit if -P given, so we'd have to detect this case
> and flag an error.
So, would you like me to:
1) rework it such that it doesn't require significant spec changes,
even if IMHO it makes the implementation a bit messier?
2) rename the flag to -fno-pwd-in-preprocessor-output or something
along these lines? I don't think -fpwd would be appropriate as it
gives the impression that the wd wouldn't make it to object files.
3) issue an error message if this option is given without -E, or if
-fpwd-in-preprocessor-output is given along with -P?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer