This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mbp at sourcefrog dot net, distcc at lists dot samba dot org
- Date: 03 Aug 2003 15:11:51 -0300
- Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <ED06E029-B327-11D7-BDE9-003065A77310@apple.com><or4r1tvene.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><orn0eqg7zx.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030803174250.GB28693@daikokuya.co.uk>
On Aug 3, 2003, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> wrote:
> I don't agree this patch is correct.
Then we'll have to fix the integrated preprocessor to do whatever you
consider to be correct. This patch only arranges for the separate
preprocessor to match what the integrated one does as far as the
compiler computes the line of a declaration.
> Does this pass the testsuite without modification?
Of course. The testsuite doesn't test for separate preprocessing. If
it did, it would have flagged the differences that the integrated
preprocessor introduced.
> Does this break people preprocessing Fortran?
I've no idea. How do I tell?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer