This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Optimize xxx*xxx using 3 multiplications.

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:13:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
References: <m3n0exgjwi.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307291429360.31828-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:44:10PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> I hate naming things and if a higher authority can provide guidance,
> I'm more than happy to follow it.  C++'s STL isn't much of a help
> here because of the polymorphism.  Perhaps __builtin_Z3powdi?  But I
> now understand why you prefer the "f" and "l" before the "i" :>

Shouldn't that be:
__builtin__ZSt3powdi
__builtin__ZSt3powfi
__builtin__ZSt3powei
?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.

Re: [PATCH] Optimize xxx*xxx using 3 multiplications.