This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [doc patch] Fix PR c++/11613
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:28:18 +0100
- Subject: Re: [doc patch] Fix PR c++/11613
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <3F210C2F.1000301@codesourcery.com> <m33cguan9q.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
| Index: doc/extend.texi
| ===================================================================
| RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/extend.texi,v
| retrieving revision 1.150
| diff -c -3 -p -r1.150 extend.texi
| *** doc/extend.texi 21 Jul 2003 15:08:55 -0000 1.150
| --- doc/extend.texi 25 Jul 2003 10:41:34 -0000
| *************** These attributes are not currently imple
| *** 2268,2275 ****
| @item unused
| This attribute, attached to a function, means that the function is meant
| to be possibly unused. GCC will not produce a warning for this
| ! function. GNU C++ does not currently support this attribute as
| ! definitions without parameters are valid in C++.
|
| @cindex @code{used} attribute.
| @item used
| --- 2268,2274 ----
| @item unused
| This attribute, attached to a function, means that the function is meant
| to be possibly unused. GCC will not produce a warning for this
| ! function.
Hmm, why did you remove that precision?
because it is untrue. GNU C++ does accept unused attributes on function
declarations, and it also now accepts them on parameter declarations.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk