This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: another baby step - namespace adjustments

> /*
>  * IBM Accurate Mathematical Library
>  * written by International Business Machines Corp.
>  * Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation
>  *
>  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>  * it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by
>  * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
>  * (at your option) any later version.
>  [etc]

That's fine.

> > Why not just *always* build gcc with -lm then?  We don't need the
> > autoconf tests; just add it unconditionally.
> 
> libm doesn't exist on all supported hosts.

Didn't we just switch policies to require C90 compatible stage1
compilers?  Wouldn't that guarantee a libm?  Or am I missing
something?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]