Re: [3.3.1 Doc patch] Backport doco changes from Mainline

[Kelley Cook <kcook34 at ford dot com>]

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> Thanks!  The typo changes are certainly fine, but some of the others don't 
> seem right.
>
> And some were changes for the worse, which at least we should not move 
> to the branch. For example, many of Zack's patches to install.texi:
>
>   -FreeBSD 1 is no longer supported in GCC 3.2.
>   +FreeBSD 1 is no longer supported.
>
> It would be much better for this to read
>
>  +FreeBSD 1 is no longer supported since GCC 3.2.
>
> Please go ahead and commit those parts you are completely confident with 
> (including type fixes, GNU CC -> GCC,...), but ask for explicit review 
> (ideally from those contributing the patch) for the other ones or simply 
> skip them.
>
> Thanks, I know this is no fun nor easy work!

Gerald et al.,

Thanks for the comments:

I now realized that an already approved patch of mine that was in my local tree
snuck regarding -m128bit-long-doubles snuck in their also.  
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00050.html

The problem is that I don't yet have cvs write access since I'm still awaiting 
the FSF folks to OK my copyright assignment.  So obviously I won't be able to 
commit anything until then which will surely be after both 3.3.1 is released 
and the hardcopy is finalized.

What should be the next step?

Kelley Cook