This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2

From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:23:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
References: <EC155AAB-B624-11D7-A31E-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20030714200133.GE18121@daikokuya.co.uk> <AB92DF88-B646-11D7-A31E-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20030714221625.GH18121@daikokuya.co.uk>

On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 3:16 PM, Neil Booth wrote:

Name is based on -Winvalid-pch and it is used in similar condition. It emits appropriate warnings if compiler validation for symbol repository fails. But again feel free to suggest better name.
-Winvalid-symsep?

Well, symbol separation can not be invalid. It is a method to create and use separate debugging symbol repositories. If user reads documentation (and developer reads first paragraph in cppss.c) then it is obvious what is 'sr' and hence -Winvalid-sr.

OK, I'll need to look at these in more detail.

I'm still waiting.

Thanks,
-Devang

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [PATCH] Symbol Separation - Take 2
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]