This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, mbp at sourcefrog dot net, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>, distcc at lists dot samba dot org, Thomas Walker <Thomas dot Walker at morganstanley dot com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:57:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: [distcc] gcc bootstraps with distcc
- References: <2B3465C0-B328-11D7-BDE9-003065A77310@apple.com>
Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:
> On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 03:26 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jul 6, 2003, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, I may have found out why the differences in macro line numbers
>>> were gone: distcc assumes -Mpwd requires local execution, so it never
>>> ran separate preprocessing and remote compilation. Oops.
>>
>> Confirmed, the problem is still there. The trick to get distcc to
>> distribute compilations and use -Mpwd is to add -Wp,-Mpwd to
>> BOOT_CFLAGS.
>
> In my version, I default -Mpwd to on, well, to be correct, I don't
> have such a flag, I always do it. I think the flag should default to
> on.
Yeah. I vote always do it, too.
zw