This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testersneeded)

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk
Cc: zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:24:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testersneeded)
References: <87ptkvfk6v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><Pine.LNX.4.56.0306302111520.382@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><878yrjjmuh.fsf@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0306302214380.6429@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

> If this file counts as an upstream one (changes go through the BFD
> contribution mechanism first) then codingconventions.html should say
> so.  If not, clarification of assignments on contribute.html is best
> done through the outcome of the deliberations that are (I presume)
> ongoing regarding the libiberty issues.

If a file is made part of the "libiberty includes" then gcc becomes
the master source, at least wrt gcc vs binutils.

References:
- Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testers needed)
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testersneeded)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testersneeded)
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Import include/filenames.h from BFD (Windows/DJGPP testersneeded)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]