This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Couple of iostreams clean ups

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:17:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] Couple of iostreams clean ups
References: <20030630100941.3a4fcd14.bkoz@nabi.net>

B. Kosnik wrote:

I get everything about this patch except for _M_mode. Why did you remove
it from the base class and then put it in both derived classes? This
seems foolish.

Basically, because it has no uses in streambuf and in this way whoever wants to derive from streambuf doesn't get it unnecessarily. I have also checked a couple of ther widespread implementations and both do the same thing (no members for storing the openmode in streambuf).

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] Couple of iostreams clean ups
  - From: B. Kosnik

References:
- Re: [v3] Couple of iostreams clean ups
  - From: B. Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]