This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix mangling of COMPOUND_EXPR

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:25:59 +0100
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix mangling of COMPOUND_EXPR
Organization: Codesourcery LLC
References: <378701c33aa7$84421aa0$114e2697@bagio>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Hello,

currently, mangle.c is broken with respect to COMPOUND_EXPR. In fact,
COMPOUND_EXPR in templates are generated so that the first operand is a
TREE_LIST which holds the two expressions, while the second operand is a
null tree. This same bug is present in error.c, and it's been fixed by my
(unreviewed) patch:

Have you investigated why COMPOUND_EXPRs are different inside templates?
It might be a hold over from the old parser which had issues with cast exprs
and abstract decls. It would be neater if you could fix it there.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
         The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix mangling of COMPOUND_EXPR
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

References:
- [C++ PATCH] Fix mangling of COMPOUND_EXPR
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]