This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge fix
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:07:52 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge fix
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1056115775.25116.2.camel@p4>, Andrew MacLeod writes:
>On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 08:56, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 law@redhat.com wrote:
>> > I haven't looked into your problem, but it might be worth picking up
>> > my fix to tree-cfg.c from earlier tonight and see if it fixes your
>> > problem. It was clearly doing the wrong thing in its handling of switch
>> > statements.
>>
>Sorry, I was off yesterday and again today, so Im not on top of these
>things. My changes to handle_switch_split were suppose to make it
>simpler rather than function changes. Clearly it needs a little more
>examination, and I dont have time right now. Try reverting the changes
>to just that function and see if that fixes your problem.
>
>Patch attached. Let me know. No testing on this yet, but it shouls be a
>simple revert... :-)
>
>Andrew
>
>
> * tree-cfg.c (handle_switch_split): Revert last change.
I'd rather not revert at this point -- doing that would cause C++ to
start blowing up :-) I'd rather slog forward through whatever issues
we need to resolve.
jeff