This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Start moving toplev options to opts.c

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:16:50 +0100
Subject: Re: Start moving toplev options to opts.c
References: <20030613224720.GB25237@daikokuya.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306141040050.18179@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20030614121442.GD25237@daikokuya.co.uk> <20030614151319.GA7009@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:-

> > I don't think the extra pain is worth it.  However, if you come up with a patch
> > I'll be happy to review it.
> 
> Then please at least document this decision.  I agree with Joseph that
> this is a bad precedent; we've put some work into making additional
> languages drop in without having to edit lists in the source.  I
> imagine you've just broken both g95 and gpc, which have been moving
> away from requiring patches in addition to a new directory.

I'm happy to come back to look at it later.  It's not just opts.h
though, it's also the AWK script.

Neil.

References:
- Start moving toplev options to opts.c
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Start moving toplev options to opts.c
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Start moving toplev options to opts.c
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Start moving toplev options to opts.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]