This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Split gcc.dg/builtins-20.c

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:23:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split gcc.dg/builtins-20.c

From the middle-end's perspective, there's no point in splitting the
*f from *l.  There's currently only a single backend macro controlling
whether these functions are present, TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS.  However,
it would be simple to change this to two: TARGET_C99F_FUNCTIONS and
TARGET_C99L_FUNCTIONS, if you know of a platform that supports one set
and not the other?  Darwin?

OpenBSD has *f but not *l. Darwin does have not either *f or *l (but a future one will have *f but not *l inferred from Darwin's opensource libm sources in the cvs around February). I think NetBSD and FreeBSD are the same way as OpenBSD but I did not look.

Andrew

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Split gcc.dg/builtins-20.c
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]