This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:00:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
References: <1055276092.11031.91.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><wvln0gph9yj.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com><1055283286.11031.115.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com><wvlel21h8jd.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com><1055284394.11031.123.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

On 10 Jun 2003 18:33:15 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

>> Having checking in the ASM_VOLATILE_P macro would have caught this.  Oops.
>> 
> It should be a matter of wrapping ASM_EXPR_CHECK() around the macro,
> right?

Except that we use the same macro for ASM_STMT.

Jason

References:
- [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] Fix gimplification of volatile asms [patch]
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]