This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>,Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,Tim Josling <tej at melbpc dot org dot au>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
- References: <3EE4F737.30905@student.tudelft.nl><Pine.LNX.4.44.0306091714210.14066-100000@ops2.one-point.com><16101.46320.736811.833185@cuddles.redhat.com>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Yes. My current plan is to convert the gcj byte compiler as part of
> converting java to tree-ssa. If that's going to be too late in the
> release cycle I guess my plan needs to change.
Which release?
Last time I tested, tree-ssa slowed down our already slow compiler quite
a bit, so I cannot imagine tree-ssa being part of a release in the near
future, as much as I like that approach and project. :-(
(See PR8361 for an example.)
Gerald