This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCOV fix for the Mingw platform
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Pascal Obry <p dot obry at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 20:14:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCOV fix for the Mingw platform
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <16078.29743.708000.113008@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030525150407.GB25304@redhat.com> <16081.8407.296000.12933@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030605224632.GA22840@redhat.com> <16096.61738.593000.157791@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Pascal Obry wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
> Sorry for the delay in getting to this but your patch doesn't
> seem to apply to the gcc trunk. What version of gcc was this made against?
This patch was against the gcc-32 branch. (gcc-3_2-branch tag).
Is that ok or should I provide a patch against the gcc-head ?
please. If you're reworking the patch, can you see if libiberty provides
a suitable function -- 'basename' I guess. IIRC, both \ and / are
permitted, and 'C:' drivenames can be confusing too.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk