This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:15:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support
References: <20030602200328.GT24872@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306022108270.16961@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20030602163732.E13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306022140180.22536@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:46:35PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> With the flag_pic / flag_shlib separation, should platforms on which code
> is always or by default position-independent be setting flag_pic by
> default?

I see no particular advantage to that.


r~

References:
- [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] -fpie/-fPIE/-pie GCC support
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]