This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH to decl.c: Factor debug code
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
| On 30 May 2003 19:28:21 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
|
| > Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
| >
| > | On 30 May 2003 03:12:26 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
| > |
| > | > OK for mainline?
| > |
| > | Mostly.
| > |
| > | > OK for branch?
| > |
| > | What branch, and why?
| >
| > Because a name-lookup performance patch depends on it.
|
| I assume you're talking about the 3.3 branch?
Yes.
| I don't think a name-lookup performance patch would be acceptable for the
| 3.3 branch, either. Better performance is great, but we need to be
| conservative on release branches.
So, just to make sure I understand correctly. Are you saying that a
name-lookup performance patch (which addresses a compile-time
performance issue) is a no-no for gcc-3_3-branch?
| > I've being trying to have a consistent naming, any thing starting with
| > cxx_scope deals exclusively with scopes., which explains cxx_scope_make.
| > I think that naming scheme is fairly widespread.
|
| I suspected that was where the name came from. Let's go with
| make_cxx_scope for that one.
OK, I will make that change.
-- Gaby