This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 14:52:40 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins
References: <20030521215042.GI16629@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030522181529.GF2016@redhat.com> <20030522142442.W13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 02:24:42PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> But can we? emit_block_move already called protect_from_queue on the
> arguments.

I don't see why not.  protect_from_queue just changes what
order post-inc expressions are seen, and that's undefined anyway.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Better optimize mempcpy and stpcpy builtins
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]