This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Patches to bugs/* docs

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:42:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patches to bugs/* docs

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 03:03 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

On Wed, 21 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
I had both Wolfgang and Giovanni look this over to make sure it was
reasonable, but it still needs approval.
Is the described restriction of "blocker" severity to maintainers in fact implemented for bug submitters? (As "high" was restricted by a kludge in GNATSweb.)

No, it's not. As I explained in private email to another person, I didn't actually read the text, just did replacement based on the conversions I knew were made. I could restrict it, but we should probably be moving to milestones anyway, which would make it moot.

We could switch entirely to milestones for release management as more expressive (able to distinguish immediately which bugs are critical for 3.3.1 and which for 3.4, put a bug off to the next release (only), ...).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Patches to bugs/* docs
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]