Re: [PATCH]: Beginning of HTML doc patches

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 02:54  PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> On Wed, 21 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > -trivial covariance will work, it is incompatible with the ABI. GNATS 
> > PR
> > +trivial covariance will work, it is incompatible with the ABI. 
> > Bugzilla PR
> >  3706 tracks this problem.</dd>
>
> As Gerald noted, "PR" is GNATS-specific terminology.  We can also link 
> to
> the bug here.

Except Gerald said to use "PR", rather than "Bugzilla PR" or "GNATS PR".
Are you suggesting something different?

> > -  <li><b><a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/";>java-prs</a></b>
> > -  is a read-only list which tracks Java-related problem reports as
> > -  they are entered into our GNATS database.  Messages sent here are
> > -  also sent to <b>gcc-prs</b>.</li>
>
> I though the Java maintainers said (in discussions of conversion some 
> time
> ago) that they wanted to keep a list which all Java-related bug reports
> were sent to (without the others).

If so, i apologize. Must have forgotten.

> Do they still want this (in which case
> Bugzilla can I presume be set up to do it) or can they just get 
> Bugzilla
> to send them all bug reports in the categories they choose?

I can do it multiple ways, depending on what they want.
If they just want only new bug reports for java to go to java-prs, i 
can make java-prs@gcc.gnu.org own all new java component reports.
If they want all java bug changes, too, i can just add 
java-prs@gcc.gnu.org to the cc list of all java reports (so that they 
still get java bug changes, even after the bug is assigned to someone 
else), and unassigned@gcc.gnu.org will still own all new reports.

>
Java guys, what's the story (copied to gcc@gcc.gnu.org in case they 
don't read gcc-patches).
--Dan