This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New lang hook: ok_for_sibcall


Fergus Henderson writes:
 > On 21-May-2003, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > > Fergus Henderson writes:
 > >  > On 21-May-2003, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > >  > > Sibcalls break Java programs in interesting ways.  To fix this while
 > >  > > still allowing sibcalls to be used where it won't hurt, I need to be
 > >  > > able to control when a sibcall is allowed.
 > >  > 
 > >  > What about sibcalls via function pointers?
 > >  > For those, fndecl in expand_call() will be a null pointer.
 > >  > Your patch doesn't seem to handle that case.
 > > 
 > > It doesn't need to.  The test 'fndecl == NULL_TREE' is before the call
 > > to ok_for_sibcall.
 > 
 > Which test `fndecl == NULL_TREE'?   Specifically, which source file,
 > revision number, and line number? 
 > 
 > I don't see any such test in calls.c in the current mainline.
 > I think you may be looking at an old version of calls.c?

Indeed I have; I was fixing a bug in gcc 3.3.  I'll tweak my patch for
mainline and resubmit.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]