This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: "obvious" requirements
- From: Kelley Cook <kcook34 at ford dot com>
- To: Matt Kraai <kraai at alumni dot cmu dot edu>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:59:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: "obvious" requirements
- Hop-count: 1
- References: <20030518232511.GE13668@ftbfs.org> <Pine.BSF.4.55.0305191119070.3171@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20030519150617.GB13692@ftbfs.org> <Pine.BSF.4.55.0305201334510.53404@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Matt Kraii wrote:
OK to commit the following?
...
<p>Also note that fixes for obvious typos in ChangeLog files, docs,
web pages, comments and similar stuff need not be approved. Just
! check in the fix. We don't want to get overly anal about checkin
! policies.</p>
<p>When you have checked in a patch exactly as it has been approved,
you do not need to tell that to people -- including the approver.
--- 135,142 ----
<p>Also note that fixes for obvious typos in ChangeLog files, docs,
web pages, comments and similar stuff need not be approved. Just
! check in the fix and copy it to <code>gcc-patches</code>. We don't
! want to get overly anal about checkin policies.</p>
<p>When you have checked in a patch exactly as it has been approved,
you do not need to tell that to people -- including the approver.
Maybe, I'm just being anal, but as long as your touching this section
might it be prudent to change the vulgarity "anal" to the less tacky
"picky"?
Kelley Cook